data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/873f8/873f851b54803991093cd5a7bd2b9ff0a929c49c" alt="Poker1.com default content graphic"
Poker1 news discussion
This news entry is repeated as it appeared on the Poker1 News page (in the main menu).
Your comments are invited below
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22feb/22feb6adb30dd13be9e37e2a0ccf5bb63ca072c9" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6435/f6435ca4a747a692d660f9e44a57be9fa2800ee3" alt="" |
Tuesday →
February
25
2014
Held over
|
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear important right-to-play-poker case Reuters ↑
Mike Caro says:
Actually, I’m not unhappy with this event. It was the wrong case to establish, once and for all, that Americans have a right to play poker. There were too many other things being argued that were clouding the issue. Find a case in which people are arrested for playing poker in a friend’s house. That’s the one that’s likely to permanently establish a constitutional right to play. Keep it simple. — MC
|